requestId:68499aae7b6c16.03884446.
About Yangming’s Heart and Modern Value System—A little thoughts on Confucian personalism
Author: Huang Yusong
Source: Original “Hengshui Academy News” 2017 Issue 3
Time: Confucius was the 2568th year of Dingyou June 19th Gengzi
Jesus July 12, 2017
【Abstract】The greatest value of Yangming’s mind is to open up the modernization of Confucianism, especially the ability of Confucian individualism: despite its lower-level ethical and political philosophy, it is still striving to maintain the social norms and principles of the monarchical and political principles of the imperial era. However, under the condition of “intogenetic modernity” in the late Chinese Empire, its metaphysical level of concept of replacing the “nature” body with the “mind” body and verifying the “nature law” from the “mind” of individuals has confirmed the ability of Confucianism to move towards modernity, so the mind has emerged the modernization and individualistic direction of Confucianism in the future development, including modern thinking concepts like Wang Gen, Huang Zongxi, and Dai Zhen. Tomorrow, we should try our best to remind Yang Ming’s “heart” to contact the modern “personal”, “unrestrained”, “equality”, “sweetheart”, “common”, “rule of law” and other value concepts.
【Keywords】Confucianism; Yangmingxin learning; modern value system; personalism
Respected Teacher Xu Jialu, all the students and comrades, good book on war!
I am very grateful for the invitation from the conference to give me a benefiting, so that I have the opportunity to come and share with my friends with some of my thoughts about Yang Mingxin.
A
In the first half of the Tomorrow War Book, I heard the conversations of several teachers and had some touches. Because some of their questions are closely related to the questions I want to talk about, I will start to start with the comments about their conversations just now. To give a detailed explanation, I would like to comment on what Professor Roger Ames and Professor Du Weiming just talked about because this is closely related to the question I am going to talk about.
First talk about the views taught by An Lezhe. Because I will criticize him later, I will first say his good words, haha! In my opinion, An Zhishu is the most in-depth and in-depth expert among Easterners. Without “one”, it is “the best”. Here, I also gave him a promotional advertisement: his most original idea was the “Confucian Role Ethics” he proposed [①].
I am going to criticize him above. He 官网彩官网 talked about a focus of the point, saying that tomorrow’s East, especially his country, american, had many problems, all because of the generality of personalism, or the generality of individualism; therefore, to solve these problems, Confucianism is needed. His judgment is based on two conditions: the first is that the entire Eastern tradition is a physical theory, and the second is that Confucianism has nothing to do with individualism. These two points are not the same as me. In my opinion, these two conditions are not in place.
First of all, are these problems that occur in Oriental and american all formed by individualism? I would like to recommend a comparison example, the competition between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, whose success, international commentary, is that this is the cause of the entire Eastern genius in recent years. I also like this comment. However, the genus is absolutely non-personalism, and on the contrary, in a certain meaning, it is opposite to the real individualism. I would like to say: China will face a dangerous situation tomorrow, which is a very large danger.
Secondly, the most basic and basic “personalism” cannot integrate the entire Oriental tradition, nor can it cover the entire Oriental philosophy. In fact, the modern and medieval traditions of the East are collectively, just like the modern and medieval traditions of China. The 大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大大
Third, according to the views of Mr. An, Confucianism speaks “related” and has nothing to do with individualism. I don’t criticize this judgment very much, even though I believe in his Confucianism. To describe Confucianism as only talking about relationships and not individuals, this is a generalization. In fact, there have been long history of Confucianism’s concepts of individualism, or perhaps close to individualism and are connected with individualism. I will talk about this a little later when I will say it.
Along the way, even if the Eastern individualism goes beyond the head, this is not a problem for China. In China, the individualism is not over-the-top, but a serious lack.
Later, it was the remarks of Teacher Du Weiming, and his views with Teacher An were different. Teacher Du’s views are based on my own understanding, and they have tolerated two meanings. On the first level, even if the Eastern individualism has formed some problems, the values of modern civilization, such as unrestrained, civilized, legal system, etc., are actually inseparable from personalism. I understand that this is the first meaning that Teacher Du wants to express. In the second level, he also admitted that this difference between the understanding and the Eastern personalism was overstated, so these problems were formed; however, in his opinion, we will study Yangmingxin tomorrow in the hope of discovering some ideological resources from it, which can not only accommodate the value of personalism, but also take care of the “relationships” mentioned by the Chief An. I have won this view from Teacher Du.
What I want to discuss above is my understanding of this problem, that is, the question of how to connect the values of modern civilization with the values of mind.
2
The topic “Yangming Mind and Modern Value System” I want to discuss is the topic of “destiny composition” that the conference met, which just fits the basic task of modernism that I have reversed and strengthened in the modern history: “the national expression of modernity pleading” [②]. To reject ethnic expressions is the full-length European faction; to reject modern sexual claims is the fundamentalist principle.
The so-called “modern value system” is a modern question, and this concept itself does not touch the common sense.The problem is because “modernity” is not a concept of nation, but a concept of time. Whether China or the East has or is in the process of changing from premodern society to modern society, this is the inevitable trend of the historical development of human society. Because of this, modern values such as “unrestrained”, “equality”, “interest”, “interest”, and “legal system” that originated in the process of Oriental modernization have also been taken into our “focus value view”.
However, the social transformation of monolithic “modernity” also manifests itself as the diversified “modernization form” of different ethnic countries. Female College Students’ Career ClubThis is because: one of the basic representations of modernization is the construction of the ethnic minority state; and this is closely related to the historical civilization tradition (time dimension) and career methods (concurrent dimension) of a specific ethnic group. In other words, “modern sexual accusation” must be expressed as “ethnic expression”. In China, this classical system of ethnic expression is Confucianism. Therefore, the rejuvenation of Confucianism is also certain; this is like Christianity, which is not abandoned in the process of modernization in the East, but is reborn through the transformation of modernity.
I want to emphasize that China’s modernity is not actually the “strength” of the East” that has been strengthened to us; China’s “endogenous modernity” occurred as early as the Song Dynasty. Unfortunately, this historical process has been repeatedly disrupted by the alien invasion, especially the invasion of the Yuan and Mongolians, the invasion of the Qing Dynasty and the invasion of the Japanese (Japan). Whether in the East or China, modernity develops in the middle and late periods of the Middle Ages. China’s “endogenic modernity” concentrates on the developed urban and its prosperous urban life methods.
In synchronized with this, the expression of ethnicity in China’s modern nature accusations, that is, the modernization of Confucianism, has long occurred. [③] China’s modern approach to urban life has sufficient and colorful reactions in the late empire literature and art concepts, but is concealed by the so-called “Song and Ming Ching” research form. Therefore, I proposed the initiative to “rewrite the history of Confucianism.” [④]
3
The modernization of Confucianism includes the Confucianism’s personal theorie
發佈留言